Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination
نویسنده
چکیده
Communications regulators over the next decade will spend increasing time on conflicts between the interests of broadband providers and the public’s interest in competitive innovation environment on the internet. As the policy questions this conflict raises are basic to communications policy, they are likely to appear in many different forms. So far, the first major appearance has come in the “open access” (or “multiple access”) debate, over the desirability of allowing vertical integration between Internet Service Providers and cable operators. Proponents of open access began to see it as a structural remedy to will guard against an erosion of the “neutrality” of the network as between competing applications. Critics, meanwhile, have taken open-access regulation as unnecessary and likely to slow the pace of broadband deployment.
منابع مشابه
Introduction to a Special Issue on Network Neutrality
“Network neutrality” encompasses a wide-ranging debate over what limits, if any, should be placed on network providers in pricing or managing Internet traffic. The articles in this volume tackle various aspects of this debate: Have other transportation networks been truly “neutral”? Should broadband providers be allowed to charge content providers for connecting with end users? How much price d...
متن کاملAscertaining the Reality of Network Neutrality Violation in Backbone ISPs
On the Internet today, a growing number of QoS sensitive network applications exist, such as VoIP, imposing more stringent requirements on ISPs besides the basic reachability assurance. Thus, the demand on ISPs for Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with better guarantees is increasing. However, despite overprovisioning in core ISP networks, resource contention still exists leading to congestion a...
متن کاملThe Benefits and Risks of Mandating Network Neutrality, and the Quest for a Balanced Policy
A fundamental issue in the network neutrality debate is the extent to which network operators should be allowed to discriminate among Internet packet streams to selectively block, adjust quality of service, or adjust prices. This paper first reviews technology now available for traffic discrimination. It then shows how network operators can use this technology in ways that would make the Intern...
متن کاملThe Economics of Network Neutrality Are “ prophylactic ” remedies to nonproblems needed ?
| Winter 2011-2012 S ince “network neutrality” first appeared in policy debates, its meaning has been less than crystal clear. Some advocates have argued that net neutrality demands that broadband Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all bits equally: “a bit is a bit is a bit,” while others make exceptions for malware bits, spam bits, child pornography bits, etc. Some advocates have argued t...
متن کاملA Tale of Two Commissions: Net Neutrality and Regulatory Analysis
Two independent federal regulatory agencies, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), both claim regulatory authority over broadband Internet access. Both have actively explored the costs and benefits of “net neutrality” regulation since 2005, when a series of FCC decisions declared that broadband is an information service rather than a telecommuni...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- JTHTL
دوره 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003